https://cryptopricetracking.com

Author Topic: The Films Thread  (Read 201605 times)

Offline styles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 827
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #300 on: October 15, 2012, 08:55:12 PM »
Man with the golden gun
Never argue with an idiot, he'll drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Work hard, be nice.

Offline jman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3483
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #301 on: October 25, 2012, 01:49:06 PM »
How long did that take to look up  :P

1 Day left till Bond - unfortunately I have to wait until 8:30pm to see it.. gay!

After watching them all in the past month or 2.. this is how I stack them...

1. Goldfinger
2. Goldeneye
3. From Russia With Love
4. Thunderball
5. The Living Daylights
6. Live and Let Die
7. Octopussy
8. OHMSS
9. Dr. No
10. Casino Royale
11. Tomorrow Never Dies
12. The Spy Who Loved Me
13. You Only Live Twice
14. The Man With The Golden Gun
15. The World Is Not Enough
16. Diamonds Are Forever
17. License To Kill
18. For Your Eyes Only
19. A View To A Kill
20. Quantum of Solace
21. Die Another Day
22. Moonraker

Offline bealec

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 618
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #302 on: October 26, 2012, 11:08:25 PM »
Just watched Choke. It's based on the Chuck Palahniuk book. I've read the book and the film gives a good account of the book. Obviously it leaves bits out as all films of books do but I enjoyed it.

It's a weird story though. Easy to get lost.

Offline jman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3483
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #303 on: October 28, 2012, 03:21:21 PM »
Have to say, Im not Daniel Craigs biggest fan, but Skyfall is an awesome film... well worth going to watch... far better than Casino Royale and QoS for me...

...and without giving anything away... I did feel that Skyfall should of been DC's first bond film though... that might make more sense when you see it... 

...there were some bits I was nitpicking over after the film.. and I also thought that overall the film wasn't "bond" enough.. felt more like Bourne at some points.. but it was still fantastic and thoroughly enjoyed it

8.5/10

Offline Dragontao

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #304 on: October 28, 2012, 10:56:54 PM »
I personally think Craig is the best Bond so far by a country mile. But that's my personal opinion, obviously others will have their own.
Choosing which political party to vote for is like trying to decide if you'd rather have syphilis, gonorrhea or herpes.

Offline jman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3483
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #305 on: October 29, 2012, 10:32:45 AM »
Everyone has their favourites... I always find it hard to put Roger Moore at the bottom of my "favourite bond" list because he did the most bonds - but he was truly awful and cringe-worthy in some films.. some of his lines were so bad they were good!

I think after watching Skyfall, I'd put it in at a solid number 7 on my list... best film since Goldeneye - definitely.. but not enough to break into my top 5 though.

I'd actually move QoS down to 2nd worst film though, on further reflection, I realised I hated it more than Die Another Day which is only down there because everything about it was stupid and OTT.

Offline jman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3483
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #306 on: October 30, 2012, 11:11:03 PM »
WTF... Disney have bought out the star wars studio and planning to release a new trilogy for it... Episode 7 to come out in 2015  :o  :o

Offline Late

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2145
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #307 on: October 30, 2012, 11:44:18 PM »
Very odd news. (Holy hell, but four billion dollars is a ridiculous amount of money, though...)
Awful to say, but I can't help wonder if he's had some bad news from his doctor.
Star Wars has always been his cash cow and he's always kept tight control over it but I hear he effectively retired about a year ago and now he's cashing in his future earnings from it...




Watched this week:
Sound Of My Voice. Watchable, though rather slow. Low budget, so not much glamour, but it's got a nice premise, and the script was okay.  Quite enjoyed it. I'll give it 6.5/10.

Taken 2. Wasn't expecting much from this. A cash-in sequel to a surprise hit is usually a recipe for a poor film.
Whilst it's not as good as the first I actually thought it very good though. Loved the unusual use of grenades. 8/10

Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. One of the battiest films I've ever seen. Not a comedy, but ridiculously silly - I laughed pretty much from start to finish. If you're after some light-hearted entertainment with lots of "bullet-time"-type action and effects (albeit an axe rather than bullets most of the time) then you could certainly do a lot worse than this. 7/10.
Pretend I have a cool signature thing here.
I did, but the host site died and I can't be arsed to find an alternative right now...

Offline harv

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8993
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #308 on: October 31, 2012, 12:30:35 AM »
Well they left it open for a (at the time) fourth film after Return Of The Jedi, when the ghosts of Ben, Yoda and Anakin said 'there is another', meaning Princess Leia. The whole thing was based on The Adventures of Luke Skywalker series of novels written by Lucas as far as I remember...can't remember how many books there were now though. :-\ The disasters that were the last (first) three films wouldn't be included due to Luke Skywalker not being in them.

I definitely had the book of the first film that was subtitled The Adventures Of Luke Skywalker when I was a kid. Was bloody great, had Biggs and Luke in an early part which makes the 'shooting wamp rats at home' line making sense, and I think Biggs also had something to do with Jabba The Hut too as far as I remember. Also had photos from the film in the middle too. 8)

Wonder if my Mum has still got that..? Might be in her loft somewhere, could be worth a few quid now.
"This you have to understand. There's only one way to hurt a man who's lost everything. Give him back something broken."

Thomas Covenant, Unbeliever

Offline Late

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2145
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #309 on: October 31, 2012, 11:05:21 AM »
...when the ghosts of Ben, Yoda and Anakin said 'there is another'...
It's been a long time since I last watched any of the Star Wars films, but I seem to recall Yoda saying that quote (to Obi Wan - Anakin wasn't there at all) in The Empire Strikes Back, and he was referring to Leia taking over from Luke if he was unable to take down the Emperor and Vader (hence Anakin not joining the convo!). You only saw the ghosts of Ben, Yoda, and Anakin together right at the end of Return of the Jedi, and they never said anything.
As I say, I may be remembering it wrong though. *
Equally Lucas has fiddled with those films so often that maybe the scene you described did happen in one release and not in others.


It could go in any direction. There's been hundreds of books set after ROTJ (I read a fair few of them back in the day) written by any number of authors. I recall Luke setting up a Jedi Academy (and of course one or two students going over to the dark side); and Han & Leia's kids being strong in the force and having a few adventures; plus a few books with old Empire strongholds/admirals making a grab for power.
There's pretty much infinite scope and they could easily adopt any of the above arcs - but it's more likely they'll want to take things in their own direction completely.





* Loved the films when I was a kid, but the wife loved them more - to the degree she watched them so often I got sick of them.
Way to ruin Star Wars for me even more than Episodes 1-3 did... >:(
Pretend I have a cool signature thing here.
I did, but the host site died and I can't be arsed to find an alternative right now...

Offline Dragontao

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #310 on: October 31, 2012, 12:39:12 PM »
Well they left it open for a (at the time) fourth film after Return Of The Jedi, when the ghosts of Ben, Yoda and Anakin said 'there is another', meaning Princess Leia. The whole thing was based on The Adventures of Luke Skywalker series of novels written by Lucas as far as I remember...can't remember how many books there were now though. :-\ The disasters that were the last (first) three films wouldn't be included due to Luke Skywalker not being in them.

Being a Star Wars fan from day one (being old enough to have seen it at the Cinema first time round), the Star Wars series was originally intended to be 9 films. That is what George Lucas originally stated.

The first trilogy were parts 4, 5 and 6. The second trilogy parts 1, 2 and 3 though they screwed up a bit because they couldn't fit the clone wars in, though that was then going to be a live action TV series scheduled for something like 98 or 120 parts if I recall. They were then going to make the final trilogy (parts 7,8 and 9).

The books co-incided with the films rather than the films being based on the books because it was always Lucas' intention to make films and the books have the script pretty much intact in them.

The first book published was Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Skywalker in 1976. It has had it's title revamped a bit since then (I think it has also had the "A New Hope" added to it). It was 190 pages and contained a few glossy photo pages in the middle which were stills from the film, with production notes. The notes for the first photo, a still of Luke in his speeder, states that it was "written and developed for the large screen".

It's copyright 1976 by the Star Wars Corporation and frist printed in the UK by Sphere Books in 1977 (I've just dug the book out and looked). It is credited to George Lucas but apparently was also ghost written by Alan Dean Foster as Lucas' input was the script element. Foster did the descriptive parts, it's why the book is so close to the film.

A lot of spin off books were written using the characters and universe, but were not intended to be part of the 9 part film saga. There were a few about Han Solo and his adventures before becoming involved with the rebel alliance. A few set between and around events in the original trilogy. My favourite of them was "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" (written by Alan Dean Foster who was involved with the originals so it's probably why it's one of the best).

I have not read any of the newer books (beyond the early 80's) and there have been a lot of them.

Choosing which political party to vote for is like trying to decide if you'd rather have syphilis, gonorrhea or herpes.

Offline Dragontao

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1986
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #311 on: October 31, 2012, 12:46:29 PM »
Oh and the first thing Disney should do is have Jar Jar Binks crushed to death by stampeding Bantha and have the Death Star destroy the homeworld of the Ewoks.

Unfortunately, Disney will probably make an Ewoks series and give Jar Jar Binks his own film.
Choosing which political party to vote for is like trying to decide if you'd rather have syphilis, gonorrhea or herpes.

Offline jman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3483
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #312 on: October 31, 2012, 12:54:00 PM »
I hear episode 7 is tentatively called "Return of the Jar Jar" already  ;)

I should really watch them all again.. Im not a massive fan although I did enjoy films 3-6

Offline Late

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2145
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #313 on: October 31, 2012, 03:58:58 PM »
Oh and the first thing Disney should do is have Jar Jar Binks crushed to death by stampeding Bantha and have the Death Star destroy the homeworld of the Ewoks.

Unfortunately, Disney will probably make an Ewoks series and give Jar Jar Binks his own film.

Wahahahaha!


(Unfortunately that does sound about right.)
Pretend I have a cool signature thing here.
I did, but the host site died and I can't be arsed to find an alternative right now...

Offline ancelotti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 620
Re: The Films Thread
« Reply #314 on: October 31, 2012, 05:12:06 PM »
Saw Skyfall today... loved it! Easily DC's best film so far. Casino Royale was decent but QoS bored me to death. Agree with your point, Jman, about it being DC's first, would have made more sense given the plot, and probably would have won more people over to him. Javier Bardem was great, big fan of his, thought he was brilliant in No Country for Old Men.