I quite enjoyed it (and a couple of the females are quite hot lol).
With regard to the inbreeding thing Harv, there's actually no definitive answer. Even with a population size of 3000, some alleles are likely to be lost from the human species, some may be important, some may not. It's the founder effect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founder_effectWith larger populations, there is a decreased chance of a common ancestor 10 generations or so down the line.
However, that's not strictly true either if members of the population are carefully selected. If you take 200 people with very different backgrounds, from different areas, there's a good chance you are likely to get far more genetic diversity than if you take 2000 people from the same town. Which is how captive breeding programmes work by taking individuals with know lineage from different zoos or wild populations and breeding them together.
The numbers idea you're taling about is something akin to minimum viable population (MVP)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_viable_population and it's not as simple as just numbers. It's possible for a small number to create a viable population in the long term.
After all, we all came from Adam and Eve didn't we? (cough, ahem, bullshit). Seriously though, even without the bible stories, the human race itself would have had to have started with a relatively small sample, it's why we have so much of our DNA that is very similar and share a high percentage of our DNA with other species (and even plants).
http://hihg.med.miami.edu/about-us/what-is-geneticsGenetics and evolutionary biology are very important where conservation is concerned.
