Defence League Only2

[agadorspartacus]

Please see competition for details. Play Defence only. No Counter Attack, No Attack. Play aggression and weather. Your on trust to play Defence only, and your memory plays its part as well.

[agadorspartacus]

Six teams in. C'mon. So easy to play.

[agadorspartacus]

Eight teams in. It's viable. It's a no brainer just to play Defence only.

[agadorspartacus]

Only four spaces left. C'mon get in.

[agadorspartacus]

High stats Teams stand a good chance

[Marv999]

Would enter but apprehensive about people not sticking/ "forgetting" to set up tactics. Would only enter if results are logged in this thread and if people use other tactics then the result is automatically conceded to the disadvantaged team.

[agadorspartacus]

Would enter but apprehensive about people not sticking/ "forgetting" to set up tactics. Would only enter if results are logged in this thread and if people use other tactics then the result is automatically conceded to the disadvantaged team.

If you joined you could log the results in the thread It's very difficult to "police" this type of game. All I can suggest is that if a Team does not play Defence only, for a game, and wins, then the next day they agree to play counter all game to forfeit points.

[agadorspartacus]

This kicks off tomorrow. Remember DEFENCE only.

[agadorspartacus]

My apologies. I never logged into this team today until now. Out early, just got back. I will play counter tomorrow

[The Borg]

Kudos to people sticking to the rules. Also, to Ag for forfeiting his game today. Think Psychotic might take me out tomorrow team looks stronger than mine right now.

[agadorspartacus]

If somebody plays Attack and/or Counter against you, please let me know, so I can message them, to remind them of their commitments. I won't be asking Managers to play counter only for their next game unless they beat you, or draw with you.

[Cove]

Thanks for the rules reminder, I inadvertantly switched to attacking after 60 minutes today but that won't happen again. Luckily I lost, but if I had won, it would have deprived someone of three points.

[mihai]

This "rule" if  somebody plays Attack against someone else, then the next days has to play counterattack, doesn't seem to give any reparation to the manager that lost 3 points.
It  would rather be correct to count 3 points at the final table to the manager that lost as somebody played attacking, and if that person would not finish 1st or 2nd because he lost those 3 points he could have won, then we could ask Junior to repare the things for us and transfer the credits to the right winner.

What are your thoughts?

[stupac]

Glad I didn't enter this league. Lost 2-1 yesterday conceding 2 goals when i had the advantage. Got a bunch of aging players but nothing coming up on the transfer market lol.

[agadorspartacus]

This "rule" if  somebody plays Attack against someone else, then the next days has to play counterattack, doesn't seem to give any reparation to the manager that lost 3 points.
It  would rather be correct to count 3 points at the final table to the manager that lost as somebody played attacking, and if that person would not finish 1st or 2nd because he lost those 3 points he could have won, then we could ask Junior to repare the things for us and transfer the credits to the right winner.

What are your thoughts?

Thats one solution. If the Manager who should not have got the credits, agrees to them being taken out of their account. I can't say we would do that because that is not within my brief. Hopefully we won't get into that position. But if we do I will try and sort it at the time. For the game I did not play Defence only, I made myself play counter the next day for not adhering to the rules. The team I beat whilst not playing Defence only would not have beaten me if I had played Defence only as their stats are too low.